Legal Opinion

People, in Interest of Tsb

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1988No. 86CA1729PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Judge.

B.B., mother, appeals an order of the trial court terminating the parent-child legal relationship between her and her son, T.S.B. We affirm.

I

Mother first contends that the trial court erred in determining that the psychologist-client privilege could not be invoked to exclude the testimony of the clinical psychologist appointed by the court under § 19-11-107, C.R.S. (1986 RepLVol. 8B). We disagree.

Section 13-90-107(l)(g), C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol. 6A) provides that:

“A licensed psychologist shall not be examined without the consent of his client as to any communication made by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of M.M., a Child, and concerning C.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Clark v. District Court, Second Judicial District, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. B.B. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of M.T., J.T., and C.T., Children, and Concerning K.T.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. In the Interest of R.J.A.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. People ex rel. D.Y.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. People in the Interest of A.N-BColorado Court of Appeals · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API