People, in Interest of Tsb
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Judge.
B.B., mother, appeals an order of the trial court terminating the parent-child legal relationship between her and her son, T.S.B. We affirm.
I
Mother first contends that the trial court erred in determining that the psychologist-client privilege could not be invoked to exclude the testimony of the clinical psychologist appointed by the court under § 19-11-107, C.R.S. (1986 RepLVol. 8B). We disagree.
Section 13-90-107(l)(g), C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol. 6A) provides that:
“A licensed psychologist shall not be examined without the consent of his client as to any communication made by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of M.M., a Child, and concerning C.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Clark v. District Court, Second Judicial District, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
3Cited by13 opinions
- B.B. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of M.T., J.T., and C.T., Children, and Concerning K.T.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- In the Interest of R.J.A.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- People ex rel. D.Y.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- People in the Interest of A.N-BColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.