Legal Opinion

Conner v. Wrobel (In Re Conner)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 2003No. 19-20889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge.

Debtors Clarence and Gail Conner seek pursuant to § 522(f)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code to avoid a judicial ben of respondents John and Leslie Wrobel. According to debtors, the hen impairs an exemption they have taken in their personal residence.

Respondents assert that the property is worth far more than debtors claim and assert that their judicial lien consequently does not impair debtors’ exemption.

We find, for reasons stated in this memorandum opinion, that respondents judicial hen does not impair debtors’ exemption and consequently will…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. In Re Upset Sale, Tax Cl. Bureau of BerksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Garran v. SMS Financial V, LLC (In Re Garran)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. Morgan v. Federal Deposit Insurance (In Re Morgan)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re BallingerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2013
  2. Lindsey v. Spagnol (In Re Lindsey)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Denillo v. Iron & Glass Bank (In Re Denillo)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API