Legal Opinion

Corinne Anne Staigg Neagle v. William Brooks and Maud Ella Brooks

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 22, 1967No. 8667PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERR, District Judge.

In this diversity action, the plaintiff has appealed from orders of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that under the doctrine of res judicata plaintiff is precluded from renewing her litigation in the federal court. Appellant contends that the state court proceedings are not res judicata for the reason that the state court’s order sustaining appellees’ motion to dismiss was not a valid final adjudication of her case on the merits.

On January 8, 1964, Corinne Anne Staigg Neagle filed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Ralph H. Duggins v. Joe B. Hunt, S-R Insurance Service Agency, Inc., a Corporation, and Carr Insurance Agency, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Luker v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
  3. Neagle v. BrooksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Charlyn Greene v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, d/b/a Mr. Cooper, et al.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2026
  5. Mounkes v. MounkesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API