Sineath v. Katzis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentSeawell, J.
I think the main opinion fails to apprehend the real issue in the controversy between the parties upon which decision should rest. Whatever other claims the plaintiff may have, and however *441vigorously they may have been projected into the argument of the case, the fact remains, upon a proper showing, that there is sufficient in her pleading and in the record history of the case to entitle her to equitable set-off or recoupment against whatever interest the defendant Katzis may have, and that it is within the power of the Court, in the exercise of its equity jurisdiction, to make orders to…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- The Amiable IsabellaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Embry v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Scammon v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.