Washington Fidelity National Insurance v. Kowalczek
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, J.,
after stating what was necessary in order to constitute an insurable interest as in Balt. Life Ins. Co. v. Floyd, 5 Boyce 201, 91 A. 653, and Floyd v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 5 Boyce 51, 90 A. 404, charging the jury, in part, said:. In conclusion, we will say to you, however, that if you believe that the plaintiff, whether as wife, creditor or otherwise, had an insurable interest in the life of the deceased and that such deceased did not intentionally falsely and, therefore, in bad faith misrepresent his. age or other material facts relied on by the defendant, in order to procure…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lincoln Reserve Life Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- American Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. RowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Baltimore Life Insurance v. FloydSuperior Court of Delaware · 1914
- Ajax Rubber Co. v. GamSuperior Court of Delaware · 1924
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brooks Transportation Co. v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1933