Legal Opinion
Castillo v. Frenkel
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided December 23, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Ordered that the order is modified by providing that the branch of defendant’s motion seeking to dismiss so much of the amended complaint’s first cause of action as was based upon a claim that defendant violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by sending plaintiff a notice advising him that if he sought to dispute the debt he was required to do so in writing is denied; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff brought this action alleging, in paragraph 23 (a), (b) and (c) of his amended complaint, as a first cause of action, three…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Gaidon v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Ellis v. Cohen & Slamowitz, LLPDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. IqbalAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017