Watson v. Beaty
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GRISSOM, Chief Justice.
Lucille Watson, independent executrix of the estate of H. E. Watson, sued W. W. Beaty, administrator of the estate of Sarah Watson, for conversion of bonds. In a trial to the court, judgment was rendered for the defendant and the plaintiff has appealed.
The plaintiff alleged that H. E. and Sarah Watson were married in 1913; that they had no children; that H. E. Watson had two children by a prior marriage, Lucille Watson and Lorene Thompson; that H. E. and Sarah Watson remained married until his death in 1956 and that he left a written will bequeathing and devising to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Emery v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Martin v. MoranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Jones v. StateTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Sherman v. RoeTexas Supreme Court · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re BippertUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2004
- Wing v. Houston National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967