Legal Opinion
Islamic Shura Council v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 17, 2011No. SACV 07-1088-CJC (ANx)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure against Defendants the Federal Bureau of Investigation (the “FBI”) and the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) (collectively, the “Government”), arising out of the Government’s May 2009 in camera submissions revealing that it provided false and misleading information to the Court in pleadings, declarations, and briefs regarding the documents responsive to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Islamic Shura Council v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Islamic Shura Council v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Michael Manjeet Singh v. Veith, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026