Legal Opinion

Com. Ex Rel. Knouse v. Knouse

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1941No. Appeal, 20PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This habeas -corpus proceeding was begun in June, 1940, and involves the custody of a minor child then less than three years of age. The mother of the child is the relatrix, and the father and paternal grandmother are the respondents. After hearing, the court “ordered that the respondents, George H. Knouse and Lottie Knouse, now Lottie Dunham, deliver the said Shirley Anne Knouse, the minor child, to Hilda E. Lehman and Paul E. Lehman, — they to have the care and custody of her, and support and maintain her, the said Shirley Anne Knouse.” Hilda E. Lehman is the aunt of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hixon's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Witte v. WitteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Bentley v. BentleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Albright v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. FettersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Harry v. EastridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schofield v. SchofieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Heller v. YellinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Bendrick v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API