Legal Opinion
Moglen v. Gasper
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided December 31, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMillard L. Midonick, J.
The accompanying motion is made to set aside the verdicts and the judgment on the counterclaim, and for a new trial, oh the basis of newly discovered evidence.
The jury rendered special verdicts answering four questions of fact propounded by the court. All four special verdicts were favorable to the tenant (herein called “ electrician ”) in respect *369to a counterclaim against the landlord herein for work, labor and services performed and materials supplied, as an electrician.
The electrician admittedly was unlicensed as such. He was, therefore, under section B30-17.0 of the Administrative Code of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- People v. . PrioriNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Collins v. Central Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Keister v. RankinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Corley v. New York & Harlem RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nevada Equities, Inc. v. Willard Pease Drilling Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1968
- Garcia & Diaz, Inc. v. Trans World Refining Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Todisco v. EconopoulyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989