State v. Manganella
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Haines, J..
The .jury could reasonably have found the following facts: The deceased, Chillo, conducted a grocery and confectionery store in New Haven, and tji.e home of the accused was distant about two hundred and thirty-seven feet therefrom. In the early afternoon of July 21st, 1928, a fifteen year old daughter of Cirillo, Angelina, was in charge of the store while a girl friend, Rose, was with her. A small son of the accused entered and made a purchase for one cent, giving Angelina therefor, one penny.
Shortly thereafter the accused appeared at the store and demanded of Angelina four cents…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. Chin LungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- State v. MoscaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- State v. BuxtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- State v. BuonomoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. OnofrioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. AlterioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Johnson v. Charles William Palomba Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Petrillo v. KolbaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- State v. BradleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.