Legal Opinion

State v. Manganella

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 1, 1931PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Haines, J..

The .jury could reasonably have found the following facts: The deceased, Chillo, conducted a grocery and confectionery store in New Haven, and tji.e home of the accused was distant about two hundred and thirty-seven feet therefrom. In the early afternoon of July 21st, 1928, a fifteen year old daughter of Cirillo, Angelina, was in charge of the store while a girl friend, Rose, was with her. A small son of the accused entered and made a purchase for one cent, giving Angelina therefor, one penny.

Shortly thereafter the accused appeared at the store and demanded of Angelina four cents…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. Chin LungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. State v. MoscaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  4. State v. BuxtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  5. State v. BuonomoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. OnofrioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. State v. AlterioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  3. Johnson v. Charles William Palomba Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Petrillo v. KolbaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. State v. BradleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API