Legal Opinion
Commonwealth Ex Rel. City of Hazard v. Day
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided June 10, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Cammack
— Affirming.
This case presents the question as to whether a municipality may place a tax on a nonresident liquor wholesaler, jobber or distributor, who delivers his products to customers within the municipality by means of his own trucks. The lower court held that the City of Hazard could not levy such a tax and the City prayed an appeal ; however, it did not perfect it. The appellee has filed a copy of the record in accordance with the provisions of Section 741 of the Civil Code of Practice, and has asked that the judgment be affirmed. See Brown v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ziffrin, Inc. v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- City of Covington v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
- Herd v. City of MiddlesboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Jones v. Stearns, MayorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Webb v. City of EminenceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nicholas A. Iacobucci, D/B/A Talk of the Town v. City of Newport, KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Miller v. City of Georgetown, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Gross Distributing Co. v. City of ShelbyvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
- Vertner Smith Co. v. Town of ElsmereCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- City of Russell v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.