Legal Opinion
McKinney v. Setteducatti
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 26, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), dated April 5, 1990, as denied their motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Pursuant to the terms of a contract between the defendants and the plaintiff’s employer, the plaintiff was hired to install new roof shingles upon the defendants’ roof. In the course of this job the plaintiff put up scaffolding planks secured to the underlying roof…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Henig v. Hofstra UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Baum v. RowlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blanco v. OliveriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Horizon Hobby Distributors v. GurrieroNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- Toriola v. Ha Dong HyunAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2000