Legal Opinion

Woodburn v. Chapman

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 31, 1976No. 7309PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Action to recover a penalty under RSA 539:1 which provides in pertinent part: “Whoever shall cut,... wilfully and unlawfully, any tree... standing... on the land of another person... shall forfeit to the person injured, for every pine or other timber tree so cut,... five times the value thereof; for every other tree or log of greater dimension than one foot in diameter, five dollars and three times the value thereof; for every other tree or log of the dimension of one foot in diameter, five dollars; and for every tree, log or pole less than one foot in diameter, three dollars; and for any…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  2. Beede v. LampreySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1888
  3. Hahn v. HemenwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1950
  4. Morley v. ClairmontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  5. Smith v. American Car Sprinkler Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Hynes v. WhitehouseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. French v. R. S. Audley, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Peaslee v. KoenigSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. Nollet v. PalmerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API