Legal Opinion

Worden v. Humeston & Shenandoah R'y Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 25, 1887PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Page Circuit Court. Action to recover for a personal injury alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff’s intestate. There was a trial to a jury, and a verdict,and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Ch. J.

i. railroads: engineer: tracle:r°evi-laratio'ns of man-I. The plaintiff’s intestate was employed as an -engineer on one of the defendant’s trains. While so employed, the engine which he had in charge became derailed, and was thrown down an embankment, and he was killed. The accident was caused by one of the rails becoming disconnected and displaced. The defendant’s negligence is alleged to consist in the fact that the plates, nuts, bolts and fastenings binding the rails in the defendant’s track together were left loose. The defendant denied all negligence, and undertook to show…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sweatland v. Ill. & Miss. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  2. Conners v. Burlington C. R. & N. R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Perham v. Portland Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Dillon v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Stomne v. Hanford Produce Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Sachs v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. CrottyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API