Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kormann's Hofbrau, Inc. v. O'Connell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1949Published

1DissentCohn, J.

The State Liquor Authority has revoked the restaurant *931wine and beer license of petitioner upon the ground that the licensee has violated subdivision 6 of section 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law in that it suffered and permitted its premises to become disorderly.

The licensed premises occupied as a restaurant in the year 1900 has been continued as such uninterruptedly in the same location. The principal officers and stockholders of the petitioner corporation are husband and wife who for many years worked in the restaurant for the former owner and who in 1943 purchased the business…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arnold Reuben, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  2. Matter of Arnold Reuben, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Toyos v. BruckmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  4. Stevensville Lake Holding Corp. v. O'ConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  5. Matter of Toyos v. BruckmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API