Legal Opinion
State v. Farry
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 16, 2016No. 16-210PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAVOIE, Judge.
hThe Defendant, William Farry, was convicted by a jury of armed robbery, a violation of La.R.S. 14:64. The State charged the Defendant as a habitual offender. The trial court found the Defendant to be a third habitual offender and sentenced him to life imprisonment. The Defendant now appeals his conviction.1
The Defendant, through his attorney, assigns two errors:
1. The circumstantial evidence in this case was insufficient to convict the Defendant of armed robbery.
2. The trial court erred by not granting the Defendant’s Pro Se Motion for a New Trial due to an improper ruling on…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. FarryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- State of Louisiana v. William Chester Farry Jr.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- State v. FarryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019