Cusimano v. Strianese Family Ltd. Partnership
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*745“[Jjudicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited” (Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, 479 [2006]). Such an award can be vacated by a court pursuant to CPLR 7511 (b) (1) (iii) “if it is clearly violative of a strong public policy, if it is totally or completely irrational, or if it manifestly exceeds a specific, enumerated limitation on the arbitrator’s power” (Matter of Erin Constr. & Dev. Co., Inc. v Meltzer, 58 AD3d 729, 729 [2009]). In addition, an arbitration award may be vacated “if the court finds that the rights of [a] party were prejudiced by . . .…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Mahoney-Buntzman v. BuntzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Renna v. GulloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Elder v. ElderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Erin Construction & Development Co. v. MeltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rita Cusimano v. Andrew v. Schnurr Bernard v. StrianeseNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- Matter of FrankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Loverde v. GillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Morris v. TausikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Matter of Ishakis v. LiebermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.