Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
UWork.Com, Inc. v. Paragon Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 29, 2013No. A12A2448, A12A2449Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBarnes, Presiding Judge
Paragon presented sufficient evidence to withstand summary-judgment on its claims for breach of fiduciary duty brought against Covendis and its CEO, Raymond Tsao. Because the majority concludes otherwise, I respectfully dissent to Division 4 of the majority opinion in Case No. A12A2448.11
Paragon’s Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim against Covendis. In denying summary judgment to Covendis on Paragon’s breach of fiduciary duty claim, the trial court concluded that there was some evidence that Covendis had acted as Paragon’s agent for the limited purpose of submitting new work proposals on its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lewis v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Wright v. Apartment Investment & Management Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Service Merchandise, Inc. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Jennings v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Almond v. McCranieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.