Legal Opinion

Mullenax v. State Teachers Retirement Sys. Bd., 08ap-116 (8-21-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 2008No. 08AP-116PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Relator-appellant, Karen Mullenax ("appellant"), appeals the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas decision, which denied appellant's request for a writ of mandamus ordering respondent-appellee, State Teachers Retirement System Board of Ohio ("appellee"), to reinstate appellant's disability retirement benefits.

{¶ 2} In September 1991, appellant, a teacher, applied for benefits. Appellant's physician, Dr. Dan Olson, diagnosed her with chronic fatigue syndrome and certified that she was disabled from teaching. At appellee's request, psychiatrist Dr. Daniel Tetirick examined…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BistrickyOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Hulls v. State Teachers Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Pub. Emp. Ret. S., Unpublished Decision (3-23-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Ackerman v. State Teachers Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Riddell v. State Teachers Retirement Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Ewart v. State Teachers Ret. Sys. Bd. of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State ex rel. Woodman v. Ohio Public Emp. Retirement Sys.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Parker v. State Teachers Retirement Sys. Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API