Legal Opinion
(HC) Alcantar v. Frauenheim
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 9, 2021No. 1:20-cv-01364Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JORGE ARMANDO ALCANTAR, Case No. 1:20-cv-01364-NONE-HBK 12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS PETITION1 13 v. OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS 14 S. FRAUENHEIM, (Doc. No. 1) 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner Jorge Armando Alcantar is a state prisoner without counsel proceeding pro se 19 on his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1). The petition is 20 before the court for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. 21 Under…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Martin Valdez, Jr. v. W. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.