Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 10, 1986No. 85-AB-1738; CA A38278Published

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) that denied her benefit rights pursuant to ORS 657.176(3)1 on the basis that she had admitted theft in connection with her work. We reverse.

EAB made findings of fact:

“(1) The claimant worked for the above employer from October 14, 1982 until May 2, 1985 as a clerk. (2) During a portion of her employment, the employer became concerned that the claimant was eating cookies off the shelves that she was stocking. (3) On May 2, 1985, prior to the claimant’s stocking shelves, her supervisor inspected the shelves and found no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WhitleyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Diamond Fruit Growers v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API