Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ridenour v. Brunsman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2008No. 2007-1831PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing an inmate’s complaint for a writ of mandamus. Because the inmate failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25, we affirm.

{¶ 2} In August 2007, appellant, William L. Ridenour, an inmate at Chillicothe Correctional Institution, filed a complaint in the Court of Appeals for Ross County. Ridenour requested a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Warden Timothy Brunsman, to provide Ridenour with “adequate clothing in the form of a raincoat, rubber over-shoes and thermal underwear for inclement weather at State expense.” Ridenour requested waiver of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. White v. BechtelOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Washington v. CrushOhio Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Manns v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Parker Bey v. Ohio Bur. of Sentence ComputationOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State ex rel. Swanson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Martin v. WoodsOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State ex rel. Swain v. Adult Parole Auth. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API