Hammond v. Hamby
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
It is insisted that the judgment from which this appeal comes should be reversed for the following reasons: (1) That the verdict upon which the judgment was based is unsupported by the testimony; (2-3) that the court erred in giving instructions numbered 1 and 3, and (4) that the verdict is so excessive as to demonstrate that it was the result of passion and prejudice.
The sufficiency of the testimony will be considered in connection with the instruction numbered 1, which recites the theory upon which the case was tried. It reads as follows: “The jury is instructed that if you find from a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mays v. Ritchie Grocer CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Herring v. BollingerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Rogers v. WoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kisor v. Tulsa Rendering Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
- Wilson v. CostonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Kendrick v. RankinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Shipp v. Missouri Pacific Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1938