Legal Opinion

Bayne v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 2009PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

ORIE MELVIN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellants, James and Rose Bayne (Landlord), appeal from the trial court’s refusal to include attorney’s fees as part of the judgment entered against Appellee, Ashlee Smith (Tenant), in this Landlord/Tenant dispute. After review, we find the trial court erred in refusing to permit recovery of attorney’s fees and remand for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

¶ 2 The facts and procedural background of this matter may be summarized as follows. The parties entered into a written month-to-month residential lease for the premises located at 1079…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Weaver v. American Oil CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Salley v. Option One Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Witmer v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Country Classics at Morgan Hill Homeowners' Ass'n v. Country Classics at Morgan Hill, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. The Bert Company v. Turk, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. The Bert Company v. Turk, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Castillo v. Progressive InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Hosby, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API