Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Rich

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 2006No. 04-06032; A128920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDSON, S. J.

Employer seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board (board) order dismissing its request for a hearing on a dispute concerning claimant’s request for replacement of his hearing aid. The board dismissed the dispute for lack of “jurisdiction”1 and transferred the matter to the Workers’ Compensation Division (division) for resolution. On review, employer assigns error to the board’s conclusion that the matter does not involve a dispute over the compensability of medical services within the authority of the board. We review for errors of law, ORS 183.482(8)(a), and affirm.

The…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hibbs v. Sedgwick CMS (A180280)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. Hibbs v. Sedwick CMS (A180289)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. Hibbs v. Sedgwick CMS (A180280)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. Hibbs v. Sedwick CMS (A180289)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API