Legal Opinion
Hake v. Dilworth
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 25, 1936No. 1756PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALEXANDER, Justice.
T. M. Dilworth died in March, 1932, leaving a will devising all of his property to his three children, Tom G. Dilworth, Mrs. Anna D. Hake, and Mrs. Marion Lucenay. Said will appointed Mrs. Anna D. Hake sole independent executrix without bond, with authority “to sell and convey any real estate that may belong to me and divide the proceeds thereof in the manner provided above.” Said will was admitted to probate and Mrs. Anna D. Hake duly qualified as executrix and assumed charge of the property belonging to the estate. Thereafter, in January, 1933, she brought this suit…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Smith v. AyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Carpenter v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Parker v. Bethel Hotel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Dwyer v. KalteyerTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Dunn v. VinyardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sutton v. Reagan & GeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Lone Star Gas Co. v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Houston Life Insurance v. DabbsTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Sidran v. TanenbaumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Toplitsky v. ToplitskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.