Legal Opinion

Zachary v. Overton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1941No. 11279PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. CODY, Justice.

Appellant relies for reversal Of the judgment appealed from on two grounds, namely:

1. That the court violated R. S. Article 2168a, as amended by Acts 1941, 47th Legislature, S.B. No. 136, § 1, Vernon’s Ann. Civ.St. art. 2168a (which provides among other things for the right of a party to have his cause continued for trial until ten days after the Legislature adjourns,, where he has for his counsel a member of the Legislature) by refusing his motion for continuance.

2. That, in any event, it was reversible error for the judgment of the court, dis*406missing appellant’s suit, to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First Natl. Bank of Houston v. FoxTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Burger v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Brooks v. O'ConnorTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Baker v. ArnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Currie v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Alvarado v. Magic Valley Electric Co-Op, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
  3. Dallas Bank & Trust Co. v. Commonwealth Development Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway & Public Transportation Commission v. SchlessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Gonzalez Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API