Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wickstrand v. Nelson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1935No. Docket No. 53, Calendar No. 38,401Published

1DissentWiest, J.

This opinion is in the Wickstrand case but applies as well to the Kyselka case.

This is an appeal by defendant Michigan Fuel & Light Company, a corporation, from a judgment against it for false representations made by defendant Helmer Nelson, one of its employees, inducing plaintiffs to purchase shares of stock in the American Commonwealth Power Corporation of Delaware. Mr. Nelson’s liability is not here questioned.

The alleged false representation was, in substance, that the American Commonwealth Power Corporation owned and operated the Michigan Fuel & Light Company and various other public…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. LansdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Preston v. Marquette County Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API