Legal Opinion

UNITED STEEL WORKERS v. Craig

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 21, 1990No. 88-1542PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

We hold that the duty, if any, on which the plaintiffs' claims rest, arises solely out of federal labor law (the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 141 et seq.; and the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.). The fact that the plaintiffs couched their suit in language indicative of state-law claims does not create a state-law cause of action where, as here, a state-law claim does not otherwise exist. In other words, but for the duty of fair representation implied in the union-employee relationship, inherent in federal labor law, no cause of action exists for legal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elbert Erkins v. United Steelworkers Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Systems Council U-19 & Local 841 v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lifestar Response of Alabama, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API