Legal Opinion

United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.

District Court, D. Montana

Decided March 15, 1934No. Nos. 850, 1621PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

These cases involve hours of service and operation of trains, respectively.

In the first is a motion for judgment on pleadings which disclose in the first count typical of seven, that the carrier permitted the dispatcher to remain on duty as follows: February 16, 1933, from 5 a. m. to 5:45 a. m. and from 8 a. m. to 4 p. m., and on the following day from 3 :30 a. m. to 4:20 a: m., or 9 hours and 35 minutes in the 24-hour, period from the beginning of duty as aforesaid. The dispatcher’s regularly recurring shifts began at 8 a. m. each day.

45 USCA § 62 provides that no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. New York Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Alabama, Tennessee & Northern RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API