United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
BOURQUIN, District Judge.
These cases involve hours of service and operation of trains, respectively.
In the first is a motion for judgment on pleadings which disclose in the first count typical of seven, that the carrier permitted the dispatcher to remain on duty as follows: February 16, 1933, from 5 a. m. to 5:45 a. m. and from 8 a. m. to 4 p. m., and on the following day from 3 :30 a. m. to 4:20 a: m., or 9 hours and 35 minutes in the 24-hour, period from the beginning of duty as aforesaid. The dispatcher’s regularly recurring shifts began at 8 a. m. each day.
45 USCA § 62 provides that no…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- New York Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Alabama, Tennessee & Northern RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1966