Legal Opinion

Kalter v. Kalter

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1986No. Docket 87504PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtP. C. Elliott, J.

At a hearing for increased child support, Judge Steven N. Andrews ruled as follows (we add facts by footnote):

The pertinent facts presented to the Court are as follows: The parties were divorced on January 10, 1979. Custody of the minor child, Barrett, was granted to the plaintiff mother, and the defendant father was ordered to pay child support in the amount of $100 per week.

As part of the divorce judgment, the plaintiff gave the defendant a $2,000 lien on the marital home,[ 1 ] payable on the occurrence of certain specified events. All claims to alimony were barred.

Pursuant to plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. McCarthyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Stanaway v. StanawayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Arndt v. KasemMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Copeland v. CopelandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Beverly v. BeverlyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maturo v. MaturoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Schwartz v. HaasSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Nathan v. Ehrhart (In Re Ehrhart)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
  4. Maturo v. MaturoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API