Legal Opinion

Florio v. Richardson

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 8, 1972No. 64, Docket 72-1265PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:

This appeal raises a rather narrow question of statutory interpretation: whether insurance benefits periodically paid to a stepchild pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 402(d) (1969) (the “Act”), as the result of dependency upon his stepfather, the wage earner, must be terminated upon the stepfather’s divorce. The district court held that the divorce did not terminate the benefits, a conclusion with which we agree. However, it further concluded that the benefits were terminated by reason of the child’s relationship with his natural father, which was found…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Helvering v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Edward Dvorak, Sr. v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carrie J. Cox, for Michael K. Cox, S.S. Nvk-Tp-Ducg v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Nannie Lou Boyland v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secy. Of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  3. Florio v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API