Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Kennedy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 26, 1958No. 174PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

Defendant’s exceptions do not present any question which involves the right of the plaintiff Mrs Wilson to compensation in accord with the verdict in her case. His exceptions present only the asserted negligence of D. E. Wilson, operator of the; Ford, (a) as a basis for contribution for payment of the judgment obtained by Mrs. Wilson, (b) as a bar to recovery by Wilson, the operator, of his claim for damages, (c) as the basis for liability by Wilson to defendant for damages to Kennedy’s car as asserted in the counterclaim.

When the court allowed the motion of the additional defendant, Wilson,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. State v. ClyburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Hyder v. ASHEVILLE STORAGE BATTERY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Norris v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Jackson v. Camp & Brown Produce Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shoe v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Stathopoulos v. ShookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Jones v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. White v. CothranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Williams v. Sossoman's Funeral Home, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API