Legal Opinion

J3 Eng'g Grp., LLC v. Mack Indus. of Kalamazoo, LLC

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided July 1, 2019No. Case No. 18-C-1240PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D. Mack's Motion to Transfer

Mack argues that transfer to the Northern District of Ohio is compelled because Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.62(D)(1) and Ind. Code § 32-28-3-17 void the contracts' choice of law and forum selection clauses. According to Mack, I should declare these provisions void because "[u]nder well-settled Ohio and Indiana law, those forum-selection clauses are void and unenforceable because they relate to construction projects in those states." ECF No. 16 at 1.

But this argument rests on the assumption that Ohio law and Indiana law govern these respective contracts, something that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Kubin-Nicholson Corp. v. GillonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2007

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Duby v. BarkleyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
  2. Duby v. BarkleyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  3. Hatch v. BarrettDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
  4. Otis v. FlosDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
  5. Twin Rivers Paper Company, LLC v. Complete Paper, Inc., et al.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API