J3 Eng'g Grp., LLC v. Mack Indus. of Kalamazoo, LLC
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
D. Mack's Motion to Transfer
Mack argues that transfer to the Northern District of Ohio is compelled because Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.62(D)(1) and Ind. Code § 32-28-3-17 void the contracts' choice of law and forum selection clauses. According to Mack, I should declare these provisions void because "[u]nder well-settled Ohio and Indiana law, those forum-selection clauses are void and unenforceable because they relate to construction projects in those states." ECF No. 16 at 1.
But this argument rests on the assumption that Ohio law and Indiana law govern these respective contracts, something that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Kubin-Nicholson Corp. v. GillonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2007
3Cited by6 opinions
- Duby v. BarkleyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
- Duby v. BarkleyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Hatch v. BarrettDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- Otis v. FlosDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
- Twin Rivers Paper Company, LLC v. Complete Paper, Inc., et al.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.