Legal Opinion
Piechota v. Rapp
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 29, 1947No. 32225PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.
This action is brought under the provisions of sections 30-809 and 30-810, R. S. 1943, to recover damages for the death of a 17-year-old girl. Plaintiff is the mother of the deceased. Defendant John Rapp was the owner of the car and father of defendant Carl Rapp, the driver of the car. Issues were made and trial to a jury had, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff *444against both defendants. Defendants appeal. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause.
The accident happened about one a. m., July 4, 1945, on a black-top highway in Ashton, Nebraska. Approaching…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Crecelius ex rel. Crecelius v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Everart v. FischerOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Linch v. DobsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Nelson v. HedinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Maurillo v. Park Slope U-HaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Remmenga v. SelkNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Frederick N. Peterson, Administrator of the Estate of Charles Steven Peterson, Deceased v. U-Haul Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Board of Educational Lands and Funds v. GillettNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Garska v. HarrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.