Pittman v. State

Stolz, Judge.

The defendant was discovered in the apartment of Mr. Pearson when that gentleman returned from a visit with one of his neighbors. During Mr. Pearson’s absence a screen had been removed from his bathroom window and the glass broken out of a frame. The apartment had been ransacked. The defendant was convicted of burglary and now appeals from that conviction.

1. The defendant contends that the verdict is contrary to and strongly against the weight of the evidence and that it is contrary to the law and principles of justice and equity. However, there was sufficient evidence of all of…