Legal Opinion

Claim of Lane v. Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerlihy, P. J.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed August 17, 1973, which found that the workmen’s compensation policy issued by respondent Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter Cosmopolitan) to employer Suval Industries (hereinafter Suval) was canceled prior to claimant’s injury, and, hence, appellant Great American Insurance Company (hereinafter Great American) was solely responsible for claimant’s award.

On or about April 9, 1969 Cosmopolitan was advised that its insured, Suval, was being merged into or absorbed iby the Whit-taker Corporation. The…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Franklin Mortgage Corp. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  2. Claim of Vasquez v. Gotham HotelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Claim of Lane v. Cosmopolitan Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Franklin Mortgage Corp. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  5. Reed v. International Talc Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API