Legal Opinion
Schum v. Marion T. Fannaly, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 26, 1952No. 19874PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McBRIDE, Judge.
This appeal, taken by defendant from an adverse judgment, presents only questions of fact. The trial judge handed down written reasons for judgment, which cov*136er all phases of the case, and believing the reasons to be correct we now adopt them as our own opinion in this case.
“Reasons for Judgment
“Plaintiff, on May 19, 1950, was employed by the defendant, Marion T. Fannaly, Inc., as a strawberry inspector in defendant’s plant at Poncha-toula, Louisiana. Plaintiff’s work required that she mount a platform which was approximately thirty-three inches above the floor, to perform her…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rylander v. T. Smith & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Jarrell v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Daigle v. Higgins IndustriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
- Bailey v. Maryland Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cruthirds v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- State v. GiovengoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Stringer v. Brown Paper Mill Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1953