Legal Opinion

State v. Slater

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1950No. 30874PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Appellant was convicted on three counts charging him with buying, receiving, or aiding in concealing or withholding certain personal property, knowing the same to have been wrongfully appropriated and intending thereby to deprive or defraud the legal owners of it. Count I involved an adding machine, count II a radio, and count III a fur coat.

There are fifteen assignments of error, the first four of which relate to the sufficiency of the evidence. On oral argument the state virtually conceded, and we agree, that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty on count II. As to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. State v. BrittonWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Commonwealth v. WakelinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Matter of City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. SpicaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. Monroe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  3. Wright v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. WhalonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API