Legal Opinion

Miller v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 2014PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CASTILLE.

This case concerns the continued viability of the historic police power of this Commonwealth in validating and regulating riparian rights and remedies where it is alleged that a downstream landowner which is subject to federal rail-safety regulations obstructed a natural watercourse causing upstream flooding and significant *1227damage as a result. As this is an area of law that has been regulated by the Commonwealth for centuries, and since we are not persuaded that there is a clear and manifest federal congressional intention to preempt Pennsylvania law on the issue…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Estate of EasterdaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Tubbs v. BNSF Ry. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Caranci, E. v. Monsanto CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  4. Thomas v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API