Legal Opinion

Bloomberg-Michael Furniture Co. v. Urquhart

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 16, 1928No. 18459Published

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

1. One of the grounds of the motion for a new trial was that the court erred in instructing the jury that the defendant was charged with the exercise of ordinary care, the contention being that the defendant, by his own testimony, was a common carrier under the laws of Georgia and therefore bound to use extraordinary care. The court did not err in giving the charge complained of. In the first place, the petition failed to allege that the defendant was a common carrier, but proceeded upon the theory that he was a private carrier only, and, under section 2711…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Norwich Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. The SilviaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Carlisle Packing Co. v. SandangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. The ChattahoocheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API