Legal Opinion

Henninger v. Heald

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On final hearing on pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Bird, V. C.

This bill was filed to rescind an exchange of title to lands and' to compel the defendant to reconvey the title which he received from the complainant, or in case the said Heald has conveyed the title of the land which he received in exchange, and it be thought more equitable to do so, that then the court should direct Heald to pay the consideration money which he has received. The ground upon which this bill rests is fraud. Henninger employed an agent by the naipe of Taylor to negotiate the exchange, and it is alleged that Taylor and Heald, in arranging the terms of the exchange,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  3. Gould v. . Cayuga County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Baird v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Masson v. BovetCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re BenderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1937
  2. O'Brien v. O'BrienNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  3. Bain v. CoatsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API