Moore v. Moore
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCrawley, Judge
I concur in the holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to award the wife an attorney fee. However, I dissent from the holding that the trial’s court property-division and periodic-alimony awards were inequitable.
*1161The wife received a substantial marital-property award. Although the monthly periodic-alimony payments of $4,000 from the husband were to end in 12 months, the trial court compensated for the lack of a monthly payment by awarding the wife the use of a $200,000 house on which the husband was ordered to pay the indebtedness and by ordering the husband to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ex Parte BlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte DurbinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Ex Parte WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000