Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Moore v. Moore

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 25, 2002No. 2010349Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCrawley, Judge

I concur in the holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to award the wife an attorney fee. However, I dissent from the holding that the trial’s court property-division and periodic-alimony awards were inequitable.

*1161The wife received a substantial marital-property award. Although the monthly periodic-alimony payments of $4,000 from the husband were to end in 12 months, the trial court compensated for the lack of a monthly payment by awarding the wife the use of a $200,000 house on which the husband was ordered to pay the indebtedness and by ordering the husband to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Ex Parte DurbinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Ex Parte WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API