Legal Opinion

United States v. Tucker

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided May 23, 2017No. 17-0160/ARPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was charged with, among other offenses, two specifications of unlawfully providing alcohol to a person under the age of twenty-one in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2012). In the course of Appellant pleading guilty to these two specifications, the military judge instructed Appellant that the necessary mens rea requirement for this Article 134, UCMJ, offense was “negligence.” After concluding that Appellant’s guilty plea was provident and convicting him of these two alcohol-related specifications (plus one specification of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elonis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. United States v. SchellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
  3. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
  4. United States v. HavertyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  5. EV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
  2. United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
  3. United States v. Clark-BellamyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
  4. United States v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  5. United States v. Private E1 STEVEN M. TUCKERArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API