State ex rel. Werden v. Williams
Ohio Supreme Court
Motion for leave to file a petition in error to reverse the judgment of the District Court of Mahoning county. On the 80th day of November, 1874, the relator entered into a written contract with the local directors of sub-school district No. 8, of the township above named, to-teach the public school of that subdistrict for the period of- four school months, commencing January 4, 1875, at-$125 per month.
Read the full summary
Motion for leave to file a petition in error to reverse the judgment of the District Court of Mahoning county. On the 80th day of November, 1874, the relator entered into a written contract with the local directors of sub-school district No. 8, of the township above named, to-teach the public school of that subdistrict for the period of- four school months, commencing January 4, 1875, at-$125 per month. The contract also provided for the employment' and payment by the relator of an assistant teacher for the school during the term. On the 2d day of January, 1875, at a regular meeting of the…
1Opinion of the CourtRex, J.
It is claimed by counsel for the relator, and assigned as a cause for the reversal of the judgment in this case, “ that the. district court erred in holding, as a matter of law, that the written contract between the relator and the local directors of sub-school district No. 8, as modified by the verbal agreement of January 2, 1875, between the ■same parties, was contrary to public policy and void, and •ought not to be enforced.”
It must be conceded that, under the provisions of the act of May 1, 1873, for the reorganization and maintenance of common schools (70 Ohio L. 185), and the amendments…
2Cited by5 opinions
- State, Ex Rel. Tejan v. MilbyOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
- Saunders v. StateOhio Circuit Courts · 1887
- Shiner v. NorwoodHamilton Circuit Court · 1898
- Shiner v. Village of NorwoodHamilton Circuit Court · 1898
- State ex rel. Ward v. HubbardOhio Circuit Courts · 1901