Legal Opinion
Strickland v. Pilgrim
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 17, 1927No. 597PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStanford, J.
This suit was filed by ap-pellee against Dr. D. Strickland and wife, Mrs. Lenora Strickland, to recover $1,246.87, alleged to be due him by Dr. Strickland and wife as a broker’s commission for the exchange of lands. In response to special issues the jury found: „
“(1) That the plaintiff, H. M. Pilgrim, was the procuring cause of the trade that was finally consummated between the defendants Dr. Strickland and wife, Denora Strickland, and Vermillion and Thomas.
“(2) That Dr. Strickland and H. M. Pilgrim did not agree that H. M. Pilgrim would represent Dr. Strickland in the closing out of the deal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Red River National Bank v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1918
- Edwards v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Menard v. SydnorTexas Supreme Court · 1867
- Smith v. StrahanTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Dunham v. ChathamTexas Supreme Court · 1858
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gillespie v. GillespieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Means v. MeansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. JagoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928