Odell v. Dalrymple
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and plaintiff’s motion denied. Memorandum: The court erred in granting plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint to add a derivative claim on behalf of his wife. The tort claims are time barred because plaintiff’s wife was not a party to the action as commenced and the pleadings failed to give defendants notice that she would be asserting a claim (CPLR 203 [e]; see, Kettle v Sweet Home Cent. School Dist., 152 AD2d 956). With respect to the breach of contract claims, a derivative cause of action does not lie; claims for loss of consortium…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gimenez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Kettle v. Sweet Home Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- Riley v. Champion International Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1997
- Perrin v. Hilton International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Anderson v. CarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Dowdall v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Anderson v. CarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990