Legal Opinion

City of Mount Vernon v. Seeley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, The City of Mount Vernon, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings .County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 18th day of April, 1902, denying the plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the Court

Goodrich, P. J.:

The action is brought to enjoin the defendants from posting advertising bills within the city of Mt. Vernon until they have complied with a city ordinance which, as finally amended, wás passed in June, 1901, and forbids any person to post bills within the city limits “ without first having obtained a permit therefor from the mayor of this city,” and makes any violation punishable by imprisonment or fine, or both. . The complaint alleges that the ordinance is reasonable, that defendants have obtained no license under the ordinance, but have posted bills within the city limits…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Village of New Rochelle v. LangNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of New York v. M. Wineburgh Advertising Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. City of New York v. de PeysterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Whitridge v. ParkNew York Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Coley v. CampbellNew York Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API