Legal Opinion
People v. Treuber
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 1985PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
*818Defendant contends on this appeal that the trial court should have dismissed the charges against him due to a variance between the People’s proof at trial and the indictment. Specifically, he argues that the indictment charged him with conspiring with Fellouris, Boggs, and Jones, to possess the bearer bonds stolen by Fellouris and Boggs from the Vakils’ brokerage accounts while the evidence at trial showed only that he, Boggs and Jones conspired against Fellouris to keep all of the funds for themselves.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- People v. WattsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. CharlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. HilliardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. ReyesCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.